Plaintiffs Accuse Drywall Manufacturers of Price-Fixing Print Email
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Drywall Price-Fixing Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!

 

Plaintiffs Accuse Drywall Manufacturers of Price-Fixing

By Anne Bucher

 

drywall class action lawsuitIn the U.S., the drywall market is a multi-billion dollar industry that is controlled by just nine manufacturers. In 2012, just as the nation’s housing market began to recover from the recession, the price of drywall increased by as much as 35 percent. Some experts believe this sudden price increase was the result of a coordinated effort from distributors. As a result, many lawsuits have been filed by plaintiffs who are seeking to hold the companies accountable for violating the antitrust laws. Because the demand for drywall in the U.S. is substantial, these price increases have had a huge impact on the construction industry. An average new home in the U.S. will contain more than seven tons of drywall.

Class Action Lawsuits Filed Over Unlawful Early Termination Fees Print Email
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!

 

Class Action Lawsuits Filed Over Unlawful Early Termination Fees

By Anne Bucher

 

early termination fee violationsThe early termination fee (ETF) has become a common practice for many service providers in a variety of industries, including wireless carriers, home security and payment processing companies.


The ETF is used to penalize customers who cancel their contracts early. Recently, California courts have determined that certain types of ETFs violate the law. As a result, an increasing number of Californians are taking action against companies who charge illegal ETFs. So far, these plaintiffs have received millions of dollars in settlements. These ETF lawsuits help to ensure that customers are treated fairly and that companies follow the law when imposing ETFs on customers who choose to end their contracts before the term is up.

Starbucks to Pay Workers $3 Million Class Action Settlement Over Missed Breaks Print Email
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Unpaid Overtime, Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit News!
 

Starbucks to Pay Workers $3 Million Class Action Settlement Over Missed Breaks

By Amanda Antell

 

Starbucks wage settlementOn May 13, 2013, Starbucks agreed to pay $3 million to resolve a class action lawsuit accusing the company of several wage and hour violations, including denying employees required meal breaks, issuing inaccurate wage statements, and preventing employees from collecting their accurate payments.

The Starbucks wage settlement will end a five-year-long class action lawsuit from Starbucks workers who stated they were denied off-duty breaks because the coffeehouse was too busy and understaffed, despite a company policy mandating they take breaks.
TCPA Class Action Lawsuits On the Rise Across the Country Print Email
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Text Message Spam Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!

 

TCPA Class Action Lawsuits On the Rise Across the Country

By Amanda Antell

 

unwanted cell phone callIn a recent TCPA lawsuit heard in a Federal Court in Wisconsin, plaintiff Heather Nelson alleged that a debt collector called her more than 1,000 times; she sued the debt collector for violating the TCPA, and was awarded $571,000 in statutory damages. Nelson’s argument was that the debt collector called her cell phone using a dialer preview mode, which is illegal under the TCPA. The court agreed and awarded her damages for these violations of the law.

In dialer preview mode, a company’s computer system uses an algorithm to predict when an agent will become available to receive the next call, based on the number of times the receiver has answered the phone and not answered the phone. In other words, with preview dialing, all an employee from the company would have to do is choose a telephone number from a computer screen, which violates the TCPA.

Judge Overturns $6.5M Award in First Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Print Email
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Actos Class Action Lawsuit & Settlement News!

 

Judge Overturns $6.5M Award in First Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuit

By Anne Bucher

 

Actos bladder cancer settlementOn April 26, bladder cancer patient Jack Cooper was awarded $6.5 million in his drug injury lawsuit against Takeda Pharmaceuticals, the maker of Actos (pioglitazone). Less than a month later, a judge has overturned the verdict.

Cooper initially sued Takeda after developing bladder cancer from taking the type-2 diabetes drug Actos. Thousands of Actos bladder cancer lawsuits have been filed, but because Cooper’s cancer had metastasized, his case was expedited. Cooper’s case was the first of many Actos lawsuits to reach the trial stage. Cooper argued that Takeda had failed to adequately warn doctors and patients about the risk of developing Actos bladder cancer and continued marketing the product despite being aware of the health risk associated with Actos.
Judge Approves Distribution of De Beers Consumer Class Action Settlement Checks Print Email
Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:16
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!

 

Judge Approves Distribution of De Beers Consumer Class Action Settlement Checks

By Mike Holter

 

De BeersWe finally have some good news for members of the De Beers Indirect Purchaser Consumer Subclass – U.S. District Judge Stanley R. Chesler has officially signed an order authorizing the distribution of settlement checks to consumers.

In an order signed May 13, 2013, but filed with the court yesterday, Judge Chesler approved distribution of the De Beers class action settlement fund to consumers who submitted a valid Claim Form by the original deadline of May 19, 2008 and for those who submitted late claims on or before March 1, 2013. That means consumers should be expecting settlement checks in the mail soon.

Nike+ FuelBand False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit Print Email
Tuesday, 21 May 2013 13:24
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!

 

Nike+ FuelBand False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit

By Kimberly Mirando

 

Nike+ FuelBand A new class action lawsuit filed Friday accuses Nike Inc. and Apple Inc. of charging $150 for a bogus fitness device called the Nike+ FuelBand that is supposed to track every step and calorie the person wearing it burns, but doesn't work as advertised.

California plaintiff Carolyn Levin alleges in the class action lawsuit that Apple and Nike knew that the Nike+ FuelBand registers inaccurate readings but marketed it and sold it anyway with exaggerated claims about its capabilities.

Over 900 Dilantin Users Claim Stevens Johnson Syndrome Print Email
Tuesday, 21 May 2013 13:32
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) Class Action Lawsuit News!
 

Over 900 Dilantin Users Claim Stevens Johnson Syndrome

By Jessica Tyner

 

Dilantin Stevens Johnson SyndromeStevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) is a serious skin reaction that’s been linked to the seizure medication Dilantin. While an allergic reaction may sound minor, victims of Dilantin SJS are proof that an allergy can be fatal. Thus far, 945 people who were prescribed Dilantin, a popular anticonvulsant, have claimed the drug caused them to suffer Stevens Johnson Syndrome. SJS is often misdiagnosed as the flu, and without proper treatment it can quickly worsen and become life-threatening.


Page 1 of 429