|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 13:33 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!
Court Revives Kohl's Fake Price Discount Class Action Lawsuit
By Matt O'Donnell
A federal appeals court Tuesday revived a class action lawsuit accusing Kohl’s Corp. of falsely advertising the “regular price” on sale items, saying “price advertisements matter” to customers who make purchasing decisions based on this information.
The Ninth Circuit decision reverses an early court’s ruling that dismissed the Kohl’s price discount class action lawsuit in 2011 based on the argument that customers did not suffer economic injury from the deceptive pricing. Attorneys for Kohl’s had argued that even if the “regular” price being advertised was bogus, customers could not sue the company under California consumer protection laws because they didn’t pay more for the products than they otherwise would have.
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 13:24 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Pradaxa Class Action Lawsuit & Settlement News!
European Regulators May Join FDA in Minimizing Pradaxa Side Effects
By John Curran
Pradaxa internal bleeding side effects have not kept the prescription blood thinner from being a blockbuster medication for manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim. While it was originally approved to prevent blood clotting for people who had joint surgery, the federal Food and Drug Administration also has approved it for use in preventing issues for those with atrial fibrillation, or an irregular heartbeat. If the European equivalent of the FDA joins in, there could be significant consequences for patients.
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Drywall Price-Fixing Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!
Plaintiffs Accuse Drywall Manufacturers of Price-Fixing
By Anne Bucher
In the U.S., the drywall market is a multi-billion dollar industry that is controlled by just nine manufacturers. In 2012, just as the nation’s housing market began to recover from the recession, the price of drywall increased by as much as 35 percent. Some experts believe this sudden price increase was the result of a coordinated effort from distributors. As a result, many lawsuits have been filed by plaintiffs who are seeking to hold the companies accountable for violating the antitrust laws. Because the demand for drywall in the U.S. is substantial, these price increases have had a huge impact on the construction industry. An average new home in the U.S. will contain more than seven tons of drywall.
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!
Class Action Lawsuits Filed Over Unlawful Early Termination Fees
By Anne Bucher
The early termination fee (ETF) has become a common practice for many service providers in a variety of industries, including wireless carriers, home security and payment processing companies.
The ETF is used to penalize customers who cancel their contracts early. Recently, California courts have determined that certain types of ETFs violate the law. As a result, an increasing number of Californians are taking action against companies who charge illegal ETFs. So far, these plaintiffs have received millions of dollars in settlements. These ETF lawsuits help to ensure that customers are treated fairly and that companies follow the law when imposing ETFs on customers who choose to end their contracts before the term is up.
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Unpaid Overtime, Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit News!
Starbucks to Pay Workers $3 Million Class Action Settlement Over Missed Breaks
By Amanda Antell
On May 13, 2013, Starbucks agreed to pay $3 million to resolve a class action lawsuit accusing the company of several wage and hour violations, including denying employees required meal breaks, issuing inaccurate wage statements, and preventing employees from collecting their accurate payments.
The Starbucks wage settlement will end a five-year-long class action lawsuit from Starbucks workers who stated they were denied off-duty breaks because the coffeehouse was too busy and understaffed, despite a company policy mandating they take breaks.
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Text Message Spam Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!
TCPA Class Action Lawsuits On the Rise Across the Country
By Amanda Antell
In a recent TCPA lawsuit heard in a Federal Court in Wisconsin, plaintiff Heather Nelson alleged that a debt collector called her more than 1,000 times; she sued the debt collector for violating the TCPA, and was awarded $571,000 in statutory damages. Nelson’s argument was that the debt collector called her cell phone using a dialer preview mode, which is illegal under the TCPA. The court agreed and awarded her damages for these violations of the law.
In dialer preview mode, a company’s computer system uses an algorithm to predict when an agent will become available to receive the next call, based on the number of times the receiver has answered the phone and not answered the phone. In other words, with preview dialing, all an employee from the company would have to do is choose a telephone number from a computer screen, which violates the TCPA.
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 May 2013 06:00 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Actos Class Action Lawsuit & Settlement News!
Judge Overturns $6.5M Award in First Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuit
By Anne Bucher
On April 26, bladder cancer patient Jack Cooper was awarded $6.5 million in his drug injury lawsuit against Takeda Pharmaceuticals, the maker of Actos (pioglitazone). Less than a month later, a judge has overturned the verdict.
Cooper initially sued Takeda after developing bladder cancer from taking the type-2 diabetes drug Actos. Thousands of Actos bladder cancer lawsuits have been filed, but because Cooper’s cancer had metastasized, his case was expedited. Cooper’s case was the first of many Actos lawsuits to reach the trial stage. Cooper argued that Takeda had failed to adequately warn doctors and patients about the risk of developing Actos bladder cancer and continued marketing the product despite being aware of the health risk associated with Actos.
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:16 |
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!
Judge Approves Distribution of De Beers Consumer Class Action Settlement Checks
By Mike Holter
We finally have some good news for members of the De Beers Indirect Purchaser Consumer Subclass – U.S. District Judge Stanley R. Chesler has officially signed an order authorizing the distribution of settlement checks to consumers.
In an order signed May 13, 2013, but filed with the court yesterday, Judge Chesler approved distribution of the De Beers class action settlement fund to consumers who submitted a valid Claim Form by the original deadline of May 19, 2008 and for those who submitted late claims on or before March 1, 2013. That means consumers should be expecting settlement checks in the mail soon.
|
|