Top Class Actions on Facebook
Mercedes-Benz Reed Valve Class Action Settlement Print E-mail
 
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Settlement News!
 
Mercedes-Benz Reed Valve Class Action Settlement
By Mike Holter
 

Mercedes-BenzSome older-model Mercedes-Benz S-Class and CL-Class vehicles are prone to water damage, according to a class action lawsuit. If you’ve ever owned or leased a 2001-2006 model year Mercedes S or Mercedes CL vehicle, you may be entitled to a cash reimbursement or free future repairs from the class action lawsuit settlement.

 

The class action settlement resolves a 2008 lawsuit that claims the reed valve in the air/water duct in these vehicles is susceptible to clogging by leaves, pine needles and other debris, which can cause water to accumulate in the air/water duct and to overflow into the passenger compartment, possibly resulting in damage to electrical and other components.

 

The class action lawsuit includes two types of class members: those who currently own or lease a model year 2001-2006 Mercedes-Benz S-Class (W220) or CL-Class (W215) vehicle -- even if you haven’t incurred water damage -- and those who previously owned or leased a class vehicle who incurred out-of-pocket, unreimbursed expenses for repair of water damage due to a clogged reed valve in the air/water duct.

 

If you meet any of these class member requirements, you could receive one of the following benefits from the class action lawsuit settlement:

 

Maintenance: Mercedes-Benz dealers will now include a check and, if necessary, clearing of the reed valve in future service visits.

 

Reimbursement Program: If you incurred out-of-pocket expenses as a result of a clogged reed valve prior to May 17, 2010, Mercedes-Benz will reimburse you for all costs related to the repair (including parts and labor). Mercedes-Benz will also provide a reimbursement for one-time towing and car rental costs, up to a combined maximum of $150, that were incurred due to water damage.

 

Payment for Future Water Damage: If you experience water damage after May 17, 2010, but prior to 100,000 miles on the vehicle's odometer or 18 months after the May 17, 2010 (which ever occurs first), Mercedes-Benz will pay for the repairs.

 

More information about the benefits you can claim under the settlement can be found in the class action settlement notice.

 

All claim forms must be postmarked or submitted online by September 13, 2010, along with documentation that supports the amount you’re claiming. Downloadable claim forms and more information about the Mercedes-Benz Reed Valve Class Action Lawsuit Settlement, can be found at www.reedvalvesettlement.com.

 

 

Fill out your e-mail address to receive
the Top Class Actions newsletter!
E-mail address:
First Name:
State or Province:
 

 

Updated August 11th, 2010

 

All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2010 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
 
Nestle Settles FTC False Advertising Suit Print E-mail
 
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Settlement News!
 
Nestle Settles FTC False Advertising Suit
By Kimberly Mirando
 

Nestle probiotic Boost Kid EssentialsNestlé, the world’s largest food and nutrition company, has reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over falsely advertising the health benefits of one of its children’s drinks. The FTC said that Nestlé’s claims that its BOOST Kid Essentials drink with probiotics boosted children’s immune systems, prevented certain illnesses, sped up recovery and reduced their school absences can’t be proved, and may simply be untrue.

 

“Nestlé’s claims that its probiotic product would prevent kids from getting sick or missing school just didn’t stand up to scrutiny,” FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection director said. “Parents want to do right by their kids, and the FTC is helping them by monitoring ads and stopping those that are deceptive.”

 

The lawsuit settlement requires the food manufacturer to drop claims about the health benefits of the drink and stop claiming it will reduce sick days and other conditions unless they can back up the claims with two gold-standard clinical studies. Nestlé did not receive a financial penalty, but the settlement could result in a consumer class action lawsuit against Nestle for deceptive health claims.

 

This is the first time the FTC has challenged advertising for probiotics, but it is not the first time the health claims of products containing probiotics have been scrutinized. Dannon paid $35 million earlier this year to settle a class action lawsuit over false advertising claims of the health benefits of its Activia and DanActive probiotic yogurt products. (The claims process is still open for this class action settlement. Click here to submit your claim for a refund of up to $100 from the Dannon Class Action Lawsuit Settlement.)

 

Another food giant, Wrigley, settled a class action lawsuit over deceptive health claims earlier this year as well. The Wrigley class action was over false advertising claims about the ability of Eclipse gum to kill germs. (Click here to submit your claim for $5 or $10 from the Wrigley Class Action Lawsuit Settlement.)

 

“These settlements show that when settling cases involving health and safety claims in the future, the FTC may be very specific in the type of evidence that the advertisers will be required to possess before they are able to make similar claims again,” said Washington, D.C.-based advertising and labeling attorney Ivan Wasserman in a news report.

 

 

Fill out your e-mail address to receive
the Top Class Actions newsletter!
E-mail address:
First Name:
State or Province:
 

 

Updated August 11th, 2010

 

All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2010 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
 
Honda & Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement Print E-mail
 
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Settlement News!
 
Honda & Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement
By Kimberly Mirando

Honda

The Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad class action lawsuit settlement we told you about in April has been granted final approval. If you are a current or former owner or lessee of one the Honda or Acura vehicles listed below, you cold get a cash reimbursement of up to $125 or $150 for brake pad replacements.

 

The class action lawsuit settlement resolves claims that the rear brakes in late model Accords and Acura TSXs prematurely wear out more than twice as fast as they should. The unreasonable wear was due to an alleged defective design that caused excessive force to be applied to the vehicle’s rear wheels. The defective brake design has not been identified as a safety problem.

 

Under the class action lawsuit settlement, owners of 2008-2009 Honda Accords and 2009 Honda Acura TSXs who had the brake pads replaced and rotors resurfaced within three years of when the car was first sold or leased as a new car, or within 90 days after July 29, 2010 (whichever is later), will be reimbursed for half the cost, up to a maximum $125 for replacements using original Honda Rear Brake Pads and up to $150 for replacements using new, redesigned Honda Rear Brake Pads. The class action settlement also includes a small number of 2010 Honda Accords and some Acura TSXs that have the last six digits of the following VIN numbers:

 

2010 Honda Accord VIN Numbers:

 

000001

000002

000003

000004

000005

000006

000007

000008

000009

 

2010 Acura TSX VIN Numbers

 

In order to receive your reimbursement for old material brake pads replaced before July 29, 2010, you must file a valid claim form within 90 days of July 29, 2010. You must also provide a receipt, repair order or other documentation for each Rear Brake Pad repair or replacement that shows the part number of the brake pads used in the repair. If you’re seeking reimbursement for new material brake pads replaced after July 29, 2010, the claim form must be mailed within 90 days of the repair.

 

For more information on how to file a claim for the Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Class Action Lawsuit Settlement, visit accordsettlement.com

 

 

 

Fill out your e-mail address to receive
the Top Class Actions newsletter!
E-mail address:
First Name:
State or Province:
 

 

Updated August 10th, 2010

 

All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2010 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
 
<< Start < Prev 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Page 12 of 95