Sarah Mirando  |  June 1, 2012

Category: Labor & Employment

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Lawsuit Settlement News!

CVS Pharmacy Tech Overtime Class Action Lawsuit

By Matt O’Donnell

 

CVS PharmacyA class action lawsuit claims CVS Pharmacies stiff their pharmacy techs out of overtime pay and force them to work “off-the-clock” without compensation.

The unpaid overtime lawsuit was filed by Georgia resident Amber Mack, who worked as a pharmacy technician at CVS between 2008 and 2011.

Mack alleges in the class action lawsuit that throughout her three years of employment, she regularly worked over 40 hours per week without overtime compensation, and that her supervisors were aware of the unpaid hours she was working.

“Plaintiff was deprived of compensation to which she was entitled through Defendants’ custom and/or practice of failing to credit pharmacy technicians and lead pharmacy technicians for all hours worked – specifically, Defendants’ custom and/or practice of routinely requiring pharmacy technicians and lead pharmacy technicians to perform compensable work ‘off-the-clock,’” the class action lawsuit states.

As a result, CVS failed to pay its pharmacy techs properly for all overtime hours they worked, in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The CVS unpaid overtime class action lawsuit is brought on behalf of all individuals employed by CVS as pharmacy techs and/or lead pharmacy techs at any CVS store nationwide who performed work off-the-clock and were not credited and paid properly for all overtime hours worked during any pay period in the past three years.

It is seeking unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees and court costs.

A copy of the CVS Pharmacy Tech Overtime Class Action Lawsuit can be read here.

The case is Amber Mack v. CVS Caremark Corp., et al., Case No. 120mi-99999-UNA, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

 

Updated June 1st, 2012

 

All employment related class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Employment and Labor section of Top Class Actions

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.