Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Employment & Labor
| Unum Lawsuits Detail Deceitful Tactics Designed to Aid Claim Denials |
|
- Tuesday, 14 August 2012 11:46
Unum Lawsuits Detail Deceitful Tactics Designed to Aid Claim Denials
By Kimberly Mirando
Numerous Unum lawsuits have been filed over the insurance provider's underhanded practices, which are designed to help the company deny legitimate claims for disability insurance. One of these tactics is giving claimants the option to gather additional information or to file an extension, which is designed to eat away the claimants' time to appeal a claim denial.Stories like these are all too common, forcing many Unum policyholder to sue the company for improperly denying their claims for long-term disability benefits. These lawsuits list numerous deceitful tactics Unum allegedly does to force a claim denial, including trying to force claimants to exceed their time to appeal a claim denial.
One of the ways Unum allegedly does this is by offering claimants an Option of Reconsideration to give them an opportunity to provide additional documentation to reverse a denied claim. Unum provides claimants 180 days to appeal a denial, but many claimants do not realize they only have 45 days under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). If claimants submit paperwork after the 45-day period, Unum will deny the claim based on ERISA violations.
Another alleged way Unum improperly denies claims is by asking claimants for their permission to extend the time for Unum to review files on an appeal. Since these files are subject to ERISA's 45-day time limit, such extensions can put claimants at risk for violating ERISA. Once this time limit has expired, claimants no longer have the right to appeal an Unum claim denial. To add insult to injury, Unum asks claimants to sign the Permission to Extend, which essentially relinquishes their right to a fair and timely appeal decision.
If you fell victim to one of these deceitful Unum claim denial tactics, or had your disability insurance claim denied for any reason, contact an Unum claim denial attorney right away. An experienced attorney can determine your legal options and help you recover the benefits you deserve.
Visit the Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation to submit your information for a free, no-obligation consultation about whether you have a case. There is no charge for this initial consultation -- the Unum claim denial lawyers working this investigation don't get paid unless you do.
Updated August 14th, 2012
All employment related class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Employment and Labor section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09


