Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest Class Action Settlement News!

 Supreme Court Issues Blow to Consumer Class Actions

By Kimberly Mirando

 

Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court dealt a major blow to consumer class action lawsuits this week by ruling that corporations can force customers to arbitrate their complaints individually. The ruling arose from a closely-watched class action lawsuit against AT&T over cellphone fees called AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion.

Before the ruling, consumers who bought a product or service had been able to band together to sue corporations in a class action lawsuit if they were dissatisfied or felt they had been cheated. This allowed consumers to bypass the often-used arbitration agreements in product and service contracts that say customers must resolve disputes against companies through individual arbitration – a costly and daunting option that keeps many consumers from taking on major corporations, but one that companies prefer because it costs them less money and allows them to avoid shelling out large awards of money. By combining their small, individual claims, consumers could bring a major lawsuit against a corporation and actually win. Customer arbitration agreements are widely used by cell phone carriers, cable providers, credit card companies, stock brokerage firms and other large businesses.

Unfortunately, in Wednesday’s decision, the Supreme Court said that under the Federal Arbitration Act companies can force these disgruntled customers to arbitrate their complaints individually, not as part of a group.

Consumer-rights advocates say this will spell the end for small claims involving products or services and that a ban on class action lawsuits would be unfair to cheated consumers. Justice Stephen G. Breyer, one of the justices that opposed the ruling, said that requiring consumers to sign arbitration agreements and forbidding class action claims allows a company to “insulate” itself “from liability for its own frauds by deliberately cheating large numbers of consumers out of individually small sums of money.”

Breyer added that a ban on class action lawsuits would prevent lawyers from representing clients for small claims. “What rational lawyer would have signed on to represent the Concepcions in litigation for the possibility of fees stemming from a $30.22 claim?” he wrote. Three other justices joined his dissent.

Time will tell what the ruling in the AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion case will mean for future consumer class action lawsuits. Top Class Actions will continue to work for consumers in the mean time!

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

 

Updated April 30th, 2011

 

All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2010 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.