Amanda Antell  |  January 20, 2014

Category: Consumer News

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

T-Mobile text message class action lawsuit

T-Mobile USA Inc. is being accused of tampering with evidence that could help plaintiffs involved in an antitrust class action lawsuit concerning an alleged collusion between wireless carriers to raise the prices of pay-per-use text messages.

In a motion filed Jan. 6, plaintiffs are seeking sanctions against T-Mobile for deleting emails from two key witnesses that reportedly admitted the company deliberately collaborated with AT&T, Sprint and Verizon to increase the prices of text messages starting in 2005. The motion also says T-Mobile failed to provide notebooks and other record-keeping documents which showed product prices from previous years, and the amount that it would cost for pay-per-use text messages.

Plaintiffs allege that T-Mobile broke its own document keeping policies by deleting these emails, which were sent between the company’s director of marketing, planning and analysis, Lisa Roddy, and its former vice president of services and pricing innovation, Adrian Hurditch. Between these two executives, the emails had reportedly proved the price collusion had been planned and implemented onto customers.

T-Mobile denied the existence of any such emails, and stated that the notebooks which had contained these records had become misplaced. The plaintiffs state that this deliberate tampering constitutes to bad faith, and that the company should face consequences on top of the initial charges, either by adverse inference jury instruction or an appropriate alternative.

The initial text message price-fixing class action lawsuit was filed in 2008, when several different cell phone companies, including T-Mobile, AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless LLC and Sprint Corp, were sued for making unprecedented changes in their pricing structures of their text messaging plans. Allegedly, the companies conspired to increasing the prices of text messages for future, and even during current phone plans.

Reportedly, the company emails which contained the details of the new and increased prices of pay-per-use text messages had been intentionally deleted by the company on the same day the original class action lawsuit was filed. These allegations led to an investigation conducted by former Senator Herbery H. Kohl, due to the serious damage these actions inflicted on the case.

Additionally, several key notebooks had also gone missing soon after the motion was filed. These notebooks were kept by Roddy, and contained detailed accounts and activities of the company — and may have contained further evidence of the alleged price-fixing system.

Up until the plaintiffs filed a motion for the defendant to produce them, T-Mobile had claimed they had somehow become lost. After the motion was filed, some of the notebooks had “reappeared under a paralegal’s desk,” but the specific notebooks containing the possible price collusion evidence remain missing.

The alleged text message pricing conspiracy was supposedly started due to decreasing costs, which brought the four companies together to exchange price information and to increase their texting rates by at least one-third through a new pricing structure. The new prices prompted multiple class action lawsuits from plaintiffs across the country, which resulted in their consolidation into an MDL.

“Roddy and Hurditch were aware of the relevance of the email’s content … yet destroyed it in the breach of T-Mobile’s duty to preserve. The deletion of the Roddy-Hurditch email has harmed plaintiffs’ ability to add more detail to the smoking gun email chain in order to tilt the balance in favor of liability,” the motion said.

If found guilty of these allegations, T-Mobile will not only have to face the original charges brought against them in the original class action lawsuit, but they will also face additional charges constituting bad faith, and may face an adverse inference jury instruction.

The plaintiffs are represented by Marvin A. Miller of Miller Law LLC, while T-Mobile is represented by Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Schiff Hardin LLP.

The Text Message Price-Fixing Class Action Lawsuit MDL is In re: Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation, case number 1:08-cv-07082, in the United States District Court of Northern Illinois.

 

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

3 thoughts onT-Mobile Accused of Destroying Evidence in Text Price-Fixing Case

  1. Angelica Romero says:

    Add me. I have t mobile

  2. Sharon says:

    Bastards! & They sent me a text! I never signed up for!
    They owe me for that SPAM!

  3. Dawn says:

    They are also refusing to repay / refund any account credit if you change providers. If you have a pre-paid account, they force you to add funds over and above the replenishment amount to change any service… like adding data for a day. With a $30 plan, they refuse to refund $85 in credit. It’s a scheme and I hope it comes back to bite them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.