Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
| Path Mobile App Privacy Class Action Lawsuit |
|
|
- Thursday, 29 March 2012 13:19
Path Mobile App Privacy Class Action Lawsuit
By Mike Holter
A federal class action lawsuit claims the mobile app for the Path social network spies on consumers; gathers sensitive data such as their exact location, photos and videos; tracks their mobile browsing activity; and more, and then stores this information so insecurely that its accessible to “even an unsophisticated hacker.”According to the Path app class action lawsuit, Path gained access to users’ mobile devices without authorization and consent in order to obtain and store contact address data, including the personally identifiable information of minor children, by bypassing the technical and code-based barriers intended to limit access, in addition to bypassing users’ privacy settings, including offsite social network settings.
“The Defendant perpetuated this fraudulent activity knowingly, and with the intent to obtain data, including the mobile browsing activities of its users,” the Path app privacy class action lawsuit says.
The Path mobile app class action lawsuit is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who possessed a mobile device and downloaded the Path Application from November 15, 2010 to the date of Class certification. It is seeking a permanent injunction prohibiting the unlawful activities described in the complaint, disgorgement, damages and restitution.
A copy of the Path Mobile App Privacy Class Action Lawsuit can be read here.
The case is Oscar Hernandez v. Path, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-1515, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.
Updated March 29th, 2012
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2010 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09



