Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
| Update: De Beers Diamond Settlement Checks On the Way! |
|
|
- Thursday, 24 May 2012 13:45
Update: De Beers Diamond Settlement Checks On the Way!
By Kimberly Mirando

Finally, some good news for Class Members of the De Beers diamond class action lawsuit settlement: On May 21, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the final petition for review. Shortly after, the Claims Administrator announced it is conducting final claim audits and will distribute the class action settlement funds within the next few months.
We reported last month that the U.S. Supreme Court received a second petition for judicial review by a member of the Indirect Purchaser Class, which could have delayed the payment of claims for an undefined period of time.
Luckily, the Supreme Court did not take long making its decision, and it looks like Class Members will finally get paid after years of delays caused by challenges and appeals.
We’ll keep you notified as soon as we learn when Class Members can expect their settlement checks to arrive from the De Beers diamond class action lawsuit settlement.
A special thanks to Top Class Actions reader “Nico,” who alerted us to the update to the Settlement Administrator’s website, DiamondsClassAction.com.
We reported last month that the U.S. Supreme Court received a second petition for judicial review by a member of the Indirect Purchaser Class, which could have delayed the payment of claims for an undefined period of time.
Luckily, the Supreme Court did not take long making its decision, and it looks like Class Members will finally get paid after years of delays caused by challenges and appeals.
We’ll keep you notified as soon as we learn when Class Members can expect their settlement checks to arrive from the De Beers diamond class action lawsuit settlement.
A special thanks to Top Class Actions reader “Nico,” who alerted us to the update to the Settlement Administrator’s website, DiamondsClassAction.com.
Updated August 21st, 2012
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09




Comments
2:04-cv-02819-SRC-MAS SULLIVAN et al v. DB INVESTMENTS, INC. et al
Stanley R. Chesler, presiding
M. A. Shipp, referral
Date filed: 06/14/2004
Date terminated: 05/27/2008
Date of last filing: 04/09/2013
History
Doc.
No. Dates Description
Filed: 04/09/2013
Entered: 04/10/2013
Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings
447
Filed & Entered: 04/09/2013
Motion for Disbursement of Funds
i want to on went is my check come you in jan in"
WHAT???? my seeing-device fell out and this makes no sense...
Wednesday, 10 April 2013 15:30
De Beers Diamond Settlement Update: Distribution of Consumer Payments Approved
By Mike Holter
A New Jersey federal judge has authorized distribution of the $295 million De Beers class action settlement to consumers who filed valid claims, according to court documents filed yesterday.In his April 9 order, U.S. District Judge Stanley R. Chesler said all claims filed by Consumer Subclass Members after the claims filing deadline of May 19, 2008, but on or before March 1, 2013, will be accepted and eligible for payment, provided their claims are approved.
Judge Chesler also approved the administrative recommendations of the claims administrator, Rust Consulting, concerning the rejection of deficient and ineligible claims, finding Rust offered claimants “reasonable notice of claim deficiencies and an opportunity to cure them.”The current net balance of the De Beers Consumer Subclass Settlement Fund is just under $107.9 million, after Judge Chesler’s approved payments to the settlement administrator.C hesler also approved Rust’s recommendation to reserve from the De Beers Consumer Settlement Fund the sum of $18,075 for “future unanticipated contingencies, including for payment claimants who come forward and provide good cause as to why their previously rejected claim should be paid.”The De Beers Diamond Class Action Lawsuit Settlement case is Shawn Sullivan, et al. v. DB Investments Inc., Case No. 04-cv-2819 (SRC), U.S. District Court, New Jersey.
Ever notice that us consumers are always left on the short-end of the stick when it comes to money? How long would Uncle Sam wait for our taxes? When you have a credit at a store, utility, or credit card company, it always takes, "one to two billing cycles" for reimbursement, but you get hit with late fees and interest if you don't pay them within ten business days of the billing.. One major question: if you owed these attorneys money for their service, how many years would they wait before turning it into a lawsuit?
I have no heirs. When I die, I plan to die broke, with my credit cards maxed out, owing an attorney, and my check to the IRS bouncing.
(tongue in cheek, of course)
Good luck to everyone.
Thank You,
Total settlement: $295,000,000.00 when subdivided into certified classes:
- Direct Purchaser - $22,500,000.00
- Indirect Purchaser - $272,500,000.00 when subdivided between Resellers and Consumers:
-- Resellers - $110,806,385.50
-- Consumers - $161,693,614.50
# Bonafide Resellers Claims: 6,190
# Bonafide Consumers Claims: (unknown at this time)
Court authorizes payment Total
$33,648.17 - Rust for claims administration fees and expenses incurred and outstanding to date
$92.52 - payment of future claims administration expenses that Rust and class counsel reasonably expect will he incurred in connection with administerinu Reseller Subclass member claims.
$5,938.04 - payment of accounting/tax return preparation services related to the escrow account holding the Reseller
$403,994.93 - reimbursement of expenses incurred for Class Counsel
To What: I had hoped I would have my check by now, but both of the reps I talked to on the phone said three-to-four months. It may be that the final audit is complete and that is how long it will take for the court to approve. Who knows. I am am reasonably certain I won't have my check by mid-February.
The claims administrator has conducted a final audit of all of the claims. Checks should be mailed in the next 3 to 4 months. The representative could not tell me how many claims were valid of anything of that nature.
The number for the consumer subclass is (800) 572-3624
https://diamondsclassaction.com/pdfs/Consumer-ResellerNotice.pdf
Examples:
Mixed Stones Jewelry - Less than $200 - 6% of the retail price
Mixed Stones Jewelry - More than $200 - 14.5% of the retail price
Diamonds Only Jewelry - Less than $200 - 10.5% of the retail price
Diamonds Only Jewelry - $10,000 or more - 45% of the retail price
Loose Diamonds - Any Amount - 59% of the retail price
That's not the amount you'll get back, that's the adjustment they'll make to see what _share_ of the pie you get.
So, if there were $1,000 to be divided (just to make up #s), and the only people in the class were person A who bought a $10k diamond ring and person B who bought a $5000 loose diamond, then:
Person A: $10k *.45 = 4500 "points"
Person B: $5k *.59 = 2950 "points"
Total = 7450 "points"
$1000/7450 = $0.134/point
Person A gets 4500*.134 = $604
Person B gets 2950*.134 = $396
RSS feed for comments to this post