Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
| Starbucks Beetle Dye Class Action Lawsuit |
|
|
- Thursday, 31 May 2012 17:09
Starbucks Beetle Dye Class Action Lawsuit
By Sarah Pierce
A class action lawsuit filed in California Supreme Court is making a pretty gross allegation against Starbucks, claiming the company dyed its food and drinks with red bug carcasses. Starbucks’ strawberries & crème frappuccino, strawberry banana smoothie, raspberry swirl cake, birthday cake pop, mini donut with pink icing and velvet pie are all alleged to be made with the red beetle dye. Would you like a Tall, Grande or Venti Beetle Frappaccino?
According to the class action lawsuit, Starbucks sold food and drinks dyed red with an extract from crushed beetle carcasses, without disclosing it to customers, as required under law.
The Starbucks beetle lawsuit is alleging unfair competition, false advertising, unjust enrichment, fraud and violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act for hiding the fact that its products contained cochineal extract, which is used in many food products.
The class action lawsuit further alleges that Starbucks “bragged” about not using beets to color its products, but never mentioned that it was using bugs.
"Unbeknownst to Plaintiff and Class Members, Starbucks has been selling various red-colored food and beverage products with the added ingredient cochineal extract," the class action lawsuit states. "Cochineal extract is an extract derived from the crushed carcasses of red-colored beetles…. The extract was used by Starbucks to provide a red-color dye to the food and beverage products that were sold to unwary consumers, including Plaintiff and Class Members."
Roughly 70,000 beetles make 1 lb. of the bug dye, according to the complaint.
Some people are allergic to cochineal, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires that companies declare the ingredient on labels.
"The fact that crushed beetle carcasses were used in the production of these food items was not posted in the stores, not disclosed on the product containers or receipts, not announced by the staff, nor identified online," the class action lawsuit states.
News that Starbucks used cochineal sparked a “media frenzy” and Starbucks promised the public that it would stop using the bug dye, but that's not enough, the Plaintiff says.
The Starbucks beetle class action lawsuit is seeking a formal apology and punitive damages for a proposed class of consumers who unknowingly ingested the beetl-dyed food and drinks.
The Starbucks beetle lawsuit is alleging unfair competition, false advertising, unjust enrichment, fraud and violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act for hiding the fact that its products contained cochineal extract, which is used in many food products.
The class action lawsuit further alleges that Starbucks “bragged” about not using beets to color its products, but never mentioned that it was using bugs.
"Unbeknownst to Plaintiff and Class Members, Starbucks has been selling various red-colored food and beverage products with the added ingredient cochineal extract," the class action lawsuit states. "Cochineal extract is an extract derived from the crushed carcasses of red-colored beetles…. The extract was used by Starbucks to provide a red-color dye to the food and beverage products that were sold to unwary consumers, including Plaintiff and Class Members."
Roughly 70,000 beetles make 1 lb. of the bug dye, according to the complaint.
Some people are allergic to cochineal, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires that companies declare the ingredient on labels.
"The fact that crushed beetle carcasses were used in the production of these food items was not posted in the stores, not disclosed on the product containers or receipts, not announced by the staff, nor identified online," the class action lawsuit states.
News that Starbucks used cochineal sparked a “media frenzy” and Starbucks promised the public that it would stop using the bug dye, but that's not enough, the Plaintiff says.
The Starbucks beetle class action lawsuit is seeking a formal apology and punitive damages for a proposed class of consumers who unknowingly ingested the beetl-dyed food and drinks.
Updated May 31st, 2012
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09




Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post