Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
| AT&T Rebate Offer Class Action Lawsuit |
|
|
- Monday, 18 June 2012 12:44
AT&T Rebate Offer Class Action Lawsuit
By Kimberly Mirando
A class action lawsuit claims AT&T won’t give customers the advertised rebate offers it promises.Lead Plaintiff TdD Attorneys at Law claims in the class action lawsuit that it qualified for a $79.99 rebate when it signed a service contract with AT&T in 2009. TdD says it submitted the required information, but still hasn’t received a rebate.
“AT&T represented to TdD that entering into the agreement for telecommunications serves would entitle it to a rebate in the amount of $79.99. The representation made by AT&T was false at the time it was made,” the class action lawsuit states. Had AT&T not made the false representation, TdD “would not have entered into the specific agreement for services.”
The class action lawsuit is brought on behalf of all other persons and entities that are or have been AT&T customers who qualified for rebate offers from AT&T, attempted to redeem the rebate, and did not receive it.
It is seeking the respective unpaid rebates for Class Members, as well as punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and court costs for alleged breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, and unjust enrichment.
A copy of the AT&T Rebate Offer Class Action Lawsuit can be read here.
The case is TdD Attorneys at Law, LLC, v. AT&T, Inc. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Case No. 1222-cv-3998, 22nd Judicial Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, Missouri.
Updated June 18th, 2012
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09




Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post