Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
| Paxil Class Action Lawsuit Settlement |
|
|
- Monday, 25 June 2012 15:42
Paxil Class Action Lawsuit Settlement
By Kimberly Mirando
GlaxoSmithKline has proposed a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve allegations it falsely and deceptively advertised that its prescription antidepressant Paxil is non-addictive. If approved, the Paxil class action settlement will provide cash refunds to California residents who purchased Paxil between 1999 and 2003.The Paxil settlement will resolve a class action lawsuit, Grair v. GlaxoSmithKline, alleging GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) falsely advertised and promoted Paxil as being non-habit forming or non-addictive, and that GSK’s advertisements and promotional materials failed to disclose the risk of symptoms users may experience if they stopped using Paxil.
GSK denies these allegations, but has offered to pay an $8.5 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve the litigation.
Class Members of the Paxil class action lawsuit settlement include all California residents who were 18 years old or older and who paid for any portion of the price of Paxil while living in California from January 14, 1999 through January 1, 2003.
Class Members of the Paxil class action settlement who can provide Proof of Purchase can receive a full refund of the out-of-pocket expenses they paid for Paxil during the Class Period, provided the total amount of claims does not exceed $8.5 million.
Class Members without Proof of Purchase can still file a claim to receive up to $80 of out-of-pocket expenses, provided the total amount of these claims does not exceed $500,000.
Only out-of-pocket expenses incurred for Paxil will be refunded, including copayments and deductibles. For example, if you paid a $20 copay for a Paxil prescription, you would receive $20. You would not be entitled to receive the amount your insurance company or employer paid as part of your insurance plan.
To receive a refund from the Paxil class action settlement, you must submit a claim form and any supporting documents to the Paxil Settlement Administrator postmarked by October 10, 2012.
Claim forms and more information on your rights in the GlaxoSmithKline Paxil Class Action Lawsuit Settlement can be found at www.CAPaxilClassAction.com. Detailed instructions on how to file a claim for the Paxil settlement can be found in our Open Lawsuit Settlements section.
The case is Grair v. GlaxoSmithKline, Case No. BC 288536, Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles.
Was your baby born with a birth defect and the mother took Paxil or another antidepressant while pregnant? You may be due compensation! Please submit your information to attorneys helping children with Paxil related birth defects now!
Updated July 20th, 2012
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09




Comments
Are you sure this is true (i.e. are you sure you can't still qualify as a member of the class action)? The information above says "California residents who were 18 years old or older and who paid for any portion of the price of Paxil." It doesn't say you have to have been the patient, just that you paid for any portion of the price of Paxil.
In my opinion, this would include a parent who paid for the adolescent's medication. I could be wrong on this, but it might be worth checking this out further. Good luck! You certainly deserve to receive the same compensation as everyone else.
Another way this can happen is, for example, if a California law firm files a joint class action suit by partnering up with firms in other states. This would expand the list of states you can live in to qualify as a member of the class. That's what they did in a lawsuit several years ago, regarding adolescents who became suicidal when they started taking Paxil.
If you live in another state, and you'd like to participate in a class action suit in your state, you need to find/hire a lawyer to initiate the class action suit on your behalf. Another option is to hope that someone else hires a lawyer (or find out if a suit is already in progress) and files a class-action suit. If they win the law suit, then you could potentially qualify as a member of the class if you meet all the other requirements.
RSS feed for comments to this post