Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.
On Friday, Aetna Inc. announced that it has nixed a proposed $120 million class action settlement over claims that the insurance company paid inadequate reimbursements for out-of-network providers by using faulty databases to determine the amounts paid, citing an excessive number of potential Class Members who opted out of the settlement.
“Based on a report provided to the parties by the settlement administrator, the conditions permitting Aetna to terminate the agreement are satisfied,” Aetna wrote in a report submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “On March 13, 2014, the Company notified the New Jersey District Court and plaintiffs’ counsel that the Company was terminating the settlement agreement. Various legal and factual developments since the date of the settlement agreement led the Company to believe terminating the settlement agreement was in its best interests. Aetna intends to vigorously defend itself against the claims brought by the plaintiffs.”
According to documents filed with the court, the number of potential Class Members who opted out of the class action settlement exceeded the threshold indicated in the settlement agreement. The class action settlement website indicates that the Final Settlement Hearing that was scheduled for March 18 has been cancelled. However, the plaintiffs’ lawyers are currently investigating the reason for the termination of the class action settlement.
The Aetna out-of-pocket provider settlement was initially reached in December 2012. Under the terms of the class action settlement, Aetna agreed to pay up to $120 million to Class Members, who included health plan members and health care providers.
The Aetna out-of-pocket provider settlement would have resolved a group of class action lawsuits. The initial lawsuit was filed in New Jersey by Michele Cooper, an Aetna plan member. In 2009, a class action lawsuit was filed by a group of doctors and other health care providers. Both class action lawsuits challenged Aetna’s use of the Ingenix database and other methods to calculate out-of-network reimbursement rates. The class action lawsuits were eventually grouped into multidistrict litigation (MDL), known as In re: Aetna UCR Litigation.
For more information about the Aetna out-of-network provider settlement, keep checking www.TopClassActions.com or sign up for our free newsletter. You can also mark this article as a “Favorite” using your free Top Class Actions account to receive notifications when this article is updated.
The plaintiffs are represented by Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & Agnello PC, Whatley Kallas LLP, Pomerantz LLP, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint PC, Ridout Lyon + Ottoson LLP, Seeger Weiss LLP, Scott + Scott LLP, Kiesel Law LLP, Hoffman Libenson Saunders & Barba, and Zuckerman Spaeder LLP.
The Aetna Out-of-Pocket Provider Class Action Lawsuit is In re: Aetna UCR Litigation, Case No. 2:07-cv-03541, MDL No. 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
8 thoughts onAetna Nixes $120M Out-of-Network Provider Class Action Settlement
So is this case dead? I’ve got a ream-sized stack of copies I had sent, and would like to recycle if that’s the case.
Aetna has repeatedly refused to reimburse me the part they should for my treatment with my Dr who is not in their network. I will seek legal counsel if this continues.
Aetna increases premiums to insurers every single year but reimbursement for my glasses I receive from AETNA remains the same year after year after year at $100 (this reimbursement is allowed only every two years). Can anybody help me on how to request AETNA an increase for this reimbursement?
Do you think this is a fair action?
thanks!
I find it hard to believe that there were so many opt-outs in this case. My Mom had Aetna Insurance every year covered under this Lawsuit until 2008 when she passed away and we have been left with bills totaling $113,000.00, all out of network medical bills. While I realize not all of this may be classified under this Lawsuit, I do know that over $4,000.00 is and it would be nice to collect this and take some weight off our shoulders!
Call the law offices of the lawyers and tell them your story because they haven’t dropped the case.
James E. Cecchi
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO
D. Brian Hufford
Robert J. Axelrod
POMERANTZ GROSSMAN HUFFORD DAHLSTROM & GROSS LLP
Joe R. Whatley Jr.
Stephen A. Weiss
SEEGER WEISS LLP
Edith M. Kallas
WHATLEY KALLAS LLP
Christopher M. Burke
Joseph P. Guglielmo
SCOTT + SCOTT LLP
This is just another way to prolong this lawsuit! If we didn’t opt out, we should get paid! Ridiculous
I think it is unfair to those of us who did not opt out of the settlement not to be paid
based on the criteria stated. I am sure there are still a large number of memebers
who did not opt out of this settlement.
I knew nothing of this class action. I, too was billed several hundred dollars for services that should have been covered under the co-pay. The dr’s office nurse filed it under another dr’s name, saying he was the “in network” provider for Aetna, but he wasn’t the dr I saw! As a result, Aetna denied the claims, and still these billings are being demanded from me now through collection agencies, negatively affecting my credit!