Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
| Splenda Essentials False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit |
|
|
- Wednesday, 15 August 2012 13:43
Splenda Essentials False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit
By Kimberly Mirando
A federal class action lawsuit claims Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Nutritional misrepresent the supposed health benefits of Splenda Essentials, a no-calorie sweetener “fortified with antioxidants, B vitamins, or fiber.”According to the Splenda Essentials class action lawsuit, J&J and McNeil Nutritional “command a premium price for Splenda Essentials by distinguishing it from regular Splenda and other no-calorie sugar substitutes, and marketing it as a sweetener that ‘gives you a small boost of healthy nutrients.’ On average, Defendants charge roughly 25% more for their Splenda Essentials line than original Splenda.”
The companies “bombard consumers with a message of purported health, and draw consumer attention away from the differences between artificially added nutrients and those found in whole foods,” the class action lawsuit continues. As a result, consumers are misled into believing Splenda Essentials can give them a faster metabolism, and provide the same health benefits as antioxidants and fiber found in whole foods.
“Reasonable consumers should not be forced to look beyond the deceptive representations on Splenda Essentials’ labels and marketing materials to discover the truth about fortified nutrients” vs. whole foods,” the Splenda Essentials class action lawsuit says.
The class action lawsuit is filed on behalf of all California residents who purchased Splenda Essentials at any time within the past four years. It is seeking restitution and disgorgement of profits, damages and injunctive relief.
A copy of the Splenda Essentials False Advertising Class Action Lawsuit can be read here.
The case is Barbara Bronson, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Case No. 12-cv-4184, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.
Updated August 15th, 2012
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09




Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post