Settlement Spotlight
Active Investigations
-
California Early Termination Fee (ETF) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Depakote Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Dilantin Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Drywall Price-Fixing, Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Kidney Dialysis Heart Attack, GranuFlo & NaturaLyte Recall Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Mesothelioma Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Metal on Metal Replacement Hip Implant Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Mirena IUD Injury Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Propecia Loss of Sex Drive, Sexual Dysfunction Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Stevens Johnson (SJS) & Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Text Message Spam, Cell Phone Call TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Type 2 Diabetes Drugs Januvia, Byetta Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Unum/UnumProvident Disability Insurance Claim Denial Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Vaginal Mesh Sling Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Wage & Hour, Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
-
Yaz/Yasmin, Ocella & Beyaz Birth Control Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zithromax Z-Pak Azithromycin Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Investigation
-
Zoloft & SSRI Antidepressant Birth Defect Class Action Lawsuit Investigation
Top Settlements
Top News
Top Drug Lawsuits
Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
| Maybelline Super Stay Lipstick Class Action Lawsuit |
|
|
- Wednesday, 26 September 2012 03:00
Maybelline Super Stay Lipstick Class Action Lawsuit
By Kimberly Mirando
Maybelline has been hit with a class action lawsuit claiming its “Super Stay” lipstick and lip gloss don’t last as long as promised. The complaint accuses L’Oreal SA of falsely advertising the staying power of both products, which sell for about $9 each.According to the Maybelline Super Stay class action lawsuit, filed by three women in Manhattan federal court, L’Oreal and Maybelline make “misleading, inaccurate and deceptive” advertising claims regarding its “Super Stay 14HR Lipstick” and “Super Stay 10HR Stain Gloss.”
The products are advertised as having “super staying power” that “won’t fade,” but that’s not the experience the Plaintiffs had with the products. According to the class action lawsuit, “the Super Stay products do not remain on the wearer’s lips for the extended periods as advertised” and “wear off and fade after only a few hours of wear.”
One of the Plaintiffs claims the so-called long-lasting lipstick wears off as soon as she eats a meal or has a drink.
The Maybelline Super Stay lipstick class action lawsuit is seeking more than $5 million in damages for a proposed class of consumers who purchased the makeup based on advertising statements about their “super staying power.” It is alleging unjust enrichment, breach of warranty and violations of various consumer-protection laws.
The L’Oreal Maybelline Super Stay Lipstick Class Action Lawsuit case is Carol Leebove, et al. v. Maybelline LLC, Case No. 12-cv-07146, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.
Updated September 26th, 2012
All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 11:09




Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post