Mercedes-Benz Can’t Dodge Defective Engine Class Action Lawsuit

Top Class Actions’s website and social media posts use affiliate links. If you make a purchase using such links, we may receive a commission, but it will not result in any additional charges to you. Please review our Affiliate Link Disclosure for more information.

Mercedes-Benz Can’t Dodge Defective Engine Class Action Lawsuit

By Dominic Rivera

United States District Court Judge Thelton E. Henderson has refused Mercedes-Benz’s motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging that the company sold defective M272 and M273 engines that required costly fixes. The judge did, however, trim some claims.

Plaintiffs Majeed Seifi and Tracey Deakin sued Mercedes-Benz last year, alleging that its V-6 M272 engines installed in many models, including the C230, contain defective gears in their balance shafts that wear out prematurely, excessively and without warning. In the same manner, the class action lawsuit states that the V-8 M273 engines, installed in models including the E500, have defective idle gears that have similar issues.

Seifi is the owner of a 2006 Mercedes ML350 SUV with M272 engine. At 70,000 miles, his SUV’s check engine light went on. The dealership informed him that the vehicle had a defective balance shaft gear that required replacement that would cost him $6,000. He was also informed that his vehicle was not covered by warranty, forcing him to pay for repair, according to the class action lawsuit.

Meanwhile, Deakin’s ML350 SUV had misfiring issues without warning. The dealership told Deakin that it was a defective balance shaft gear. Because it was out of warranty, Deakin had to shoulder almost $7,000 for repair, the class action lawsuit says.

Plaintiffs said that Mercedes-Benz knew about the defects in the balance shaft gears in M272 engines and the idle gears in M273 and concealed the information. They further alleged that Mercedes Benz made misrepresentations about the reliability of its vehicles with M272 and M273 engines.

In seeking to dismiss the class action lawsuit, Mercedes-Benz argued that the plaintiffs had only purchased cars with one of the two engine models named in the lawsuit. Citing the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), which the plaintiffs claimed to have been violated by Mercedes-Benz, the defendant said that one cannot demand damages on products that plaintiffs did not buy because they do not have standing to do so. Both Seifi and Deakin have M272 engines.

In his October 10 order, the Judge said that Mercedes-Benz’s motion to dismiss the claims for express warranty and CLRA money damages for vehicles containing the M273 engine is granted. The motion to dismiss the CLRA money damages claim is denied. Meanwhile, the motion to strike the class action lawsuit in its entirety is also denied.

The order calls for any amended complaint by the Plaintiffs to be filed no later than November 8, 2013. Failure to submit an amended complaint would mean dismissing the express warranty claim and CLRA money damages claim to vehicles with M237 engine, the judge ordered.

The plaintiffs are represented by Roy A. Katriel of the Katriel Law Firm and Gary S. Graifman of Kantrowitz Goldhamer & Graifman PC.

The Mercedes-Benz Engine Defect Class Action Lawsuit is Majeed Seifi, et al. v. Mercedes Benz USA LLC, Case No. 3:12-cv-05493, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

All class action and lawsuit news updates are listed in the Lawsuit News section of Top Class Actions