Class Action News
- Class Action Lawsuit Says Lumber Liquidators Sold Illegally Sourced Toxic Wood
- Volkswagen Escapes Jetta Lock Defect Class Action Lawsuit
- Kay Jewelers Faces Class Action Lawsuit from Blind Customers
- Fisher-Price Rock ‘N Play Mold Growth Class Action Lawsuit
- PVC Decking Companies Want Class Action Lawsuit Dismissed
Drug Lawsuit News
- Parents Sue Pfizer Over Alleged Zoloft Birth Defects
- Ind. Couple Sue Stryker for Metal-on-Metal Hip Injuries
- Mentor Worldwide, Coloplast Hit with New Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit
- Lawsuit Alleges NuvaRing Manufacturer Downplayed Risks, Endangered Consumers
- Fla. Man Files Pradaxa Lawsuit after Suffering Uncontrollable Bleeding
|Diamond Walnuts Class Action lawsuit Settlement|
- Wednesday, 13 June 2012 14:38
This settlement is CLOSED!
Please join the Top Class Actions Newsletter list so you don't miss out next time and head over to the OPEN LAWSUIT SETTLEMENTS section to see what's available or the ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS section to see what compensation you may be due!
Click here to skip the legal notice and go straight to the Top Class Actions article on this class action lawsuit settlement.
No Legal Notice
Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Case(s): Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-1192-JSW, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Website of the Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Administrator (FILE YOUR CLAIM HERE): www.WalnutLabelingSettlement.com
Address to submit a claim form (REQUIRED):
Details: The Diamond walnut settlement will resolve a class action lawsuit, entitled Elliot Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., that alleges Diamond Foods misbranded its walnut products by making false and misleading statements about the health benefits of eating walnuts.
Diamond denies any wronging, but has agreed to provide $2.6 million in restitution to consumers to end the litigation.
Under the Diamond walnuts class action settlement, consumers who purchased Diamond of California brand walnuts (including, but not limited to, Shelled, Halves, Chopped, Finely Diced, Chips, Nut Toppings, and In-the-Shell Walnuts) in the United States from March 22, 2006 through January 30, 2012 are entitled to receive a share of the class action lawsuit settlement.
Class Members who purchased a 3-pound bag of Diamond of California walnuts at Sam’s Club are entitled to receive $8.25 per bag purchased during the Class Period, while Class Members who purchased any other Diamond of California walnut product can receive $3.25 per bag.
To receive your cash refund from the Diamond walnut class action lawsuit settlement, you must submit a claim form either online at www.WalnutLabelingSettlement.com or via first-class mail no later than October 26, 2012.
You do not need to submit Proof of Purchase unless you are claiming more than three 3-pound bags of walnuts or more than five bags of any other walnut products. Even with appropriate Proofs of Purchase, the maximum number of bags you can claim is 24.
Claim forms and more information on your rights in the Diamond Walnuts Class Action Lawsuit Settlement can be found at www.WalnutLabelingSettlement.com.
Purchased or Leased From: March 22, 2006 through January 30, 2012
Claims must be postmarked by: 10/26/12
Settlement Administrator(s): Kurtzman Carson Consultants
LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
This site provides information about the law and class action lawsuit settlements designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. Legal information is NOT the same as legal advice - the application of law to an individual's specific circumstances. Although we go to great lengths to make sure our information is accurate and useful, we recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it, is appropriate to your particular situation. You should consider all postings or writings at TopClassActions.com by staff or others as personal opinion only and NOT the advice of a lawyer. Top Class Actions Legal Statement
©2008 - 2012 Top Class Actions® LLC
Various Trademarks held by their respective owners.
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 December 2012 10:09